Fifa counters Uefa's legal action with accusations of a coordinated attack
Fifa has filed a court response to Uefa's request for evidence, describing it as a coordinated attack on its leadership. The world body argues Uefa's real motive is to protect its market power from growing competition. Uefa had accused Infantino of wrongdoing over a shelved plan to sell World Cup stakes.
Fifa’s court filing, submitted in the US, directly challenges Uefa’s request for evidence, framing it as a deliberate campaign to undermine its leadership. The world body insists the proposed investment scheme was never finalised and required broad member approval, while arguing Uefa’s real concern is protecting its own commercial dominance. Fifa also notes that the plan would have boosted funding for smaller associations, potentially shifting player migration patterns.
The shelved FFE venture involved a $4.2bn offer from Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Eternal for a 20% stake in a new Fifa subsidiary. Uefa’s legal actions seek testimony and documents from Kushner and adviser Greg Maffei, alleging Infantino undervalued the World Cup and bypassed proper consultation. Kushner has since expressed regret, citing political miscalculation, while three confederations have called for Infantino’s resignation.
This dispute could reshape governance and trust in global football, affecting national associations, players, and fans. If Uefa’s claims gain traction, Infantino’s authority may weaken, potentially slowing reforms or investment in developing football markets. Conversely, Fifa’s counter-arguments may reinforce perceptions of a power struggle between European elites and the wider football community. The outcome could influence how future commercial deals are negotiated and scrutinised, with implications for transparency and accountability across the sport’s governing bodies.