Updated Cochrane Analysis Finds Stronger Evidence for Cardiac Rehabilitation Across Diverse Populations

An updated Cochrane review of 107 trials involving nearly 27,000 adults with coronary heart disease found that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduced heart attacks and hospital admissions in the short term, and lowered cardiovascular mortality and heart attack risk over longer follow-up. The evidence now includes more women and participants from low- and middle-income countries, supporting both home-based and center-based programs as part of integrated care.
The updated review incorporates 22 additional trials since the 2021 version, expanding the evidence base from 85 to 107 studies. Notably, the short-term all-cause mortality benefit reached statistical significance for the first time, though the authors acknowledge that modern medical treatments may limit additional mortality gains. The inclusion of digital and home-based programs represents a significant shift, potentially expanding access for patients who cannot attend traditional center-based rehabilitation.
The review's strengthened evidence base now includes greater representation from women and participants in low- and middle-income countries, addressing previous generalizability concerns. Cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life measures consistently favored cardiac rehabilitation. The authors emphasize that exercise-based rehabilitation should complement, not replace, contemporary invasive procedures and pharmacological therapy as part of integrated coronary heart disease care.
This updated evidence could reshape how healthcare systems allocate resources for cardiac rehabilitation. If home-based and digital programs are as effective as center-based ones, health systems may expand access to underserved populations, including rural patients and those with transportation barriers. The strengthened evidence for cost-effectiveness may encourage insurers and policymakers to prioritize funding for these programs. However, implementation challenges—such as digital literacy and infrastructure in low-income regions—could limit real-world adoption despite the promising trial results.