Beshear defends transgender sports veto as RNC criticizes his record

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear defended his 2022 veto of a bill that would have barred transgender students from girls’ and women’s sports. He told CNN that Democrats should not abandon anyone and argued government should not run sports. RNC National Press Secretary Natalie Baldassarre accused Beshear of prioritizing transgender policies over female athletes.
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear vetoed Senate Bill 83 in 2022. The measure would have required girls’ and women’s teams to be based on biological sex and barred male students from participating from sixth grade through college. The GOP-led legislature overrode the veto. Beshear said the Kentucky High School Athletic Association already had rules addressing fairness concerns.
He also vetoed separate 2023 legislation, Senate Bill 150, which covered transgender medical care for minors and school restroom, locker room, and shower policies. RNC National Press Secretary Natalie Baldassarre criticized his record, while Beshear told CNN that sports should be fair and that Democrats should not abandon anyone.
Count words: First para: Kentucky(1) Gov(2) Andy(3) Beshear(4) vetoed(5) Senate(6) Bill(7) 83(8) in(9) 2022(10). The(11) measure(12) would(13) have(14) required(15) girls’(16) and(17) women’s(18) teams(19) to(20) be(21) based(22) on(23) biological(24) sex(25) and(26) barred(27) male(28) students(29) from(30) participating(31) from(32) sixth(33) grade(34) through(35) college(36). The(37) GOP-led(38) legislature(39) overrode(40) the(41) veto(42). Beshear(43) said(44) the(45) Kentucky(46) High(47) School(48) Athletic(49) Association(50) already(51) had(52) rules(53) addressing(54) fairness(55) concerns(56). Second: He(57) also(58) vetoed(59) separate(60) 2023(61) legislation(62), Senate(63) Bill(64) 150(65), which(66) covered(67) transgender(68) medical(69) care(70) for(71) minors(72)
... No extra. Need maybe two short paragraphs in EXPANDED. Under 120 words total. We have 110. Good. But "never copying source phrasing" We used "Senate Bill 83", "Senate Bill 150", "Natalie Baldassarre", "RNC", "CNN", "Democrats". Proper nouns okay. We used "transgender medical care for minors" source says "transgender medical treatments for minors" close. Could change to "gender-affirming medical care for minors"? But source says restricted transgender medical treatments. "gender-affirming" might be advocacy/not source. Better "medical treatments related to transgender care for minors" maybe. But source phrase. We can say "medical care for transgender minors" original. Let's adjust: "It covered medical care for transgender minors and school policies..." That's original. Good. Also "biological sex" source exact. Could say "sex assigned at birth" but source says biological sex. Is that same? It might be interpretation. But okay. "organized girls’ and women’s athletics by biological se