South Korean Traders Pivot to AI Tokens, Surpassing Traditional Crypto Categories

Artificial intelligence-related tokens have become the dominant trading category in South Korea's $449.1 billion crypto market, capturing 18% of won-denominated exchange activity compared to payment tokens like XRP at 15%. Worldcoin leads the surge with $7.41 billion in trading volume, followed by emerging tokens SAHARA, VIRTUAL, and BIO, representing a significant shift from 2025 when different AI tokens dominated the space. South Korean traders' preference for AI coins is dramatically higher than in other East Asian markets, with the category accounting for 19.5 times more activity than in Japan.
South Korea's crypto market has demonstrated remarkable growth, expanding 12.3% over an 18-month period to reach $449.1 billion in total value. The shift toward artificial intelligence tokens reflects changing trader preferences, as tokens like SAHARA, VIRTUAL, and BIO have recently displaced previous category leaders. This evolution suggests the market remains highly dynamic, with retail participants continuously reallocating capital based on emerging trends and new token launches.
The divergence between South Korea and other major East Asian markets is striking, with AI token activity there nearly twenty times higher than in Japan's $228.3 billion crypto ecosystem. This disparity likely stems from South Korea's retail-dominated structure and the absence of institutional participation at scale, allowing individual traders greater influence over market direction and enabling rapid capital flows toward speculative opportunities aligned with global technology trends.
The surge in AI token trading could influence retail investor behavior and market volatility in South Korea, potentially exposing less-sophisticated traders to heightened risks if speculative bubbles emerge. The impending 22% cryptocurrency tax implementation in 2027 may reshape trading patterns and market composition. Additionally, the market's reliance on retail activity rather than institutional participation could affect price stability and liquidity, with broader implications for how regulators globally approach crypto oversight in emerging markets.