California election skeptics file records requests amid misinformation concerns
Election skeptics and affiliated groups have made numerous public records requests to California election offices before the November election. Some of these organizations have histories of spreading false claims and soliciting donations from supporters who distrust election results. Law enforcement actions in Riverside and Shasta counties based on questionable findings have raised concerns about possible interference with California elections.
...
... No extra. Ensure no markdown? Plain text. Good. Potential issue: EXPANDED says 2 short paragraphs under 120 words total. We have 110. Good. But "records-request logs" maybe hyphen. Fine. Need maybe mention "law firm admitted..."? We didn't include. But enough. The instruction says additional factual detail and background drawn ONLY from material above. We included. Could include law firm? Not necessary. But maybe "additional factual detail" from material. We have enough. But maybe the first paragraph is 68, second 42. Good. Need ensure no source phrasing copied. Some phrases: "questionable findings" source says "questionable findings" exactly? Source: "relied on an activist group’s questionable findings". We used "after relying on an activist group’s questionable findings." That's copying source phrasing? It's a short phrase. The instruction says never copying source phrasing. We should rephrase. "after relying on an activist group’s questionable findings" is close. Change to "a