Nikon revokes microscopy prize after AI-assisted entry disqualified

Nikon disqualified the original first-place video in its Small World in Motion competition after determining it violated rules against generative AI. Dr. Ning Xu acknowledged using a neural-network method for AI-assisted post-processing of images that were said to show cilia in a child with PCD. The entry has been removed, Nguyen Nam Nhat now holds first place, and Nikon says it will review future contest rules and judging.
Nikon's Small World in Motion competition originally awarded first place to a video attributed to Dr. Ning Xu. The clip was described as depicting cilia in the airway of a child with PCD. After online doubts arose about its authenticity, Nikon reviewed the entry and concluded it breached contest rules concerning generative AI.
Dr. Xu said on LinkedIn that an unsupervised neural-network technique was used in post-processing to separate and display features within reconstructed grayscale images obtained through super-resolution optical imaging. The video was disqualified and removed, Nguyen Nam Nhat became first place, and Nikon said it would examine future rules and judging methods. Nikon added that the disqualification did not assess Xu's professional standing, scientific work, or intentions.
Count words: First para: Nikon's(1) Small(2) World(3) in(4) Motion(5) competition(6) originally(7) awarded(8) first(9) place(10) to(11) a(12) video(13) attributed(14) to(15) Dr.(16) Ning(17) Xu.(18) The(19) clip(20) was(21) described(22) as(23) depicting(24) cilia(25) in(26) the(27) airway(28) of(29) a(30) child(31) with(32) PCD.(33) After(34) online(35) doubts(36) arose(37) about(38) its(39) authenticity,(40) Nikon(41) reviewed(42) the(43) entry(44) and(45) concluded(46) it(47) breached(48) contest(49) rules(50) concerning(51) generative(52) AI.(53) First para 53.
Second: Dr.(1) Xu(2) said(3) on(4) LinkedIn(5) that(6) an(7) unsupervised(8) neural-network(9) technique(10) was(11) used
... No extra. Need maybe no bullet. Plain text. Ensure no markdown? Fine. Potential issue: "2 short paragraphs (under 120 words total)" We have two paragraphs. Good. "If material is thin..." not thin. Good. Need maybe "Nikon's" apostrophe. Fine. Need ensure not copying source phrasing. Let's review expanded for source phrase overlap. Source: "Nikon says the video that originally won first place in its Small World in Motion contest “did not comply with the competition rules regarding generative AI.”" I wrote "originally awarded first place to a video attributed to Dr. Ning Xu" okay. "The clip was described as depicting cilia in the airway of a child with PCD." Source: "claimed to show “tiny, hair-like structures called cilia moving in the airway of a child with the respiratory condition PCD.”" I omitted tiny hair-like. Fine. "After online doubts arose about its authenticity" source "following skepticism online about its authenticity." Changed. "Nikon reviewed the entry and concluded