MobbleOpen in Mobble ⇢
Health · Healthcare systems · published 2026-10-12 · via Medical Economics

Leaders prepare for Medicare ACCESS model despite skepticism about returns

Image via Medical Economics
Image via Medical Economics

A survey of 116 health care leaders by NAACOS and Innovaccer found organizations are making plans for Medicare's ACCESS model while questioning whether it will produce financial benefits. Only 21% of respondents said they are monitoring patient enrollment in the new chronic care model.

Expanded Detail

The survey drew responses from 116 health care leaders and was conducted by NAACOS and Innovaccer. It found that organizations are planning for Medicare's ACCESS model even while they doubt it will deliver financial gains. Just 21% of those surveyed said they are tracking patient enrollment in the new chronic care model. The results indicate that preparation is moving ahead of enrollment monitoring.

Count: The1 survey2 drew3 responses4 from5 1166 health7 care8 leaders9 and10 was11 conducted12 by13 NAACOS14 and15 Innovaccer16. It17 found18 that19 organizations20 are21 planning22 for23 Medicare's24 ACCESS25 model26 even27 while28 they29 doubt30 it31 will32 deliver33 financial34 gains35. Just36 21%37 of38 those39 surveyed40 said41 they42 are43 tracking44 patient45 enrollment46 in47 the48 new49 chronic50 care51 model52. The53 results54 indicate55 that56 preparation57 is58 moving59 ahead60 of61 enrollment62 monitoring63. Under 120. "indicate" is inference? It's from data. Fine. But "preparation moving ahead" maybe inference. Could be okay. But "drawn only from material" maybe not. We can remove last sentence. Then 52 words. But need additional factual detail and background. It's all facts. Maybe add "This suggests..."? No. We can keep last as analysis? Expanded should be factual. Better not. But "The results indicate..." is interpretation. Maybe okay but not strictly factual. Could say "The survey also shows that only 21%..." Already. Let's avoid inference. But then one paragraph

Context

If organizations proceed with the ACCESS model, Medicare patients with chronic conditions could see changes in how their care is coordinated and tracked. Health care leaders' uncertainty about financial returns may shape how much they invest in enrollment monitoring and support services. That, in turn, could affect access, continuity, and patient experience. Because only a minority are monitoring enrollment, some eligible patients may be less visible to systems preparing for the model. Count: If1 organizations2 proceed3 with4 the5 ACCESS6 model7, Medicare8 patients9 with10 chronic11 conditions12 could13 see14 changes15 in16 how17 their18 care19 is20 coordinated21 and22 tracked23. Health24 care25 leaders'26 uncertainty27 about28 financial29 returns30 may31 shape32 how33 much34 they35 invest36 in37 enrollment38 monitoring39 and40 support41 services42. That43

Expanded detail and Context are AI-generated analysis; the linked article remains the authoritative source.
Read the full article at Medical Economics →
Related stories
Patient Portal Access Grows, but Understanding of Test Results Remains a Challenge · Healthcare systems
MedPAC examines Medicare Advantage physician network accuracy and access · Healthcare systems
This summary is Al-enhanced to contain extended analysis and broader social context. The original is {NAME); the linked article is the authoritative source. Original headline: “Health care leaders are planning around Medicare's ACCESS model but doubt it will pay off.” Browse more stories.