BioNTech cancer vaccine falls short on one of two primary endpoints
An experimental mRNA cancer vaccine from BioNTech did not meet one of two primary endpoints in a pivotal trial. The result adds another challenge for the company's cancer vaccine pipeline. The therapy targets head and neck cancer.
...
... No extra. Need plain text. Ensure no markdown? Fine. Potential issue: "The candidate is designed for head and neck cancer" from summary "therapy targets head and neck cancer." Good. "pivotal study" from summary. "failed to achieve one of two main goals" okay. "The result concerns only one of the trial’s two primary endpoints; the headline and summary do not say whether the other endpoint was met." This is meta, not additional factual detail. But allowed? It says do NOT invent specifics beyond them. This is not inventing. It might be okay. But "headline and summary" maybe weird in news story. Could instead: "The available information does not indicate whether the other primary endpoint was met." That's fine. "No further details about the trial’s design, patient group, or next steps were provided." This is meta. It might be okay. But maybe "additional factual detail and background drawn ONLY from material above" - saying no further details is not drawn from material? It's about abse