Supreme Court Reform Polls Show Strong Majority for Change
A draft article at CleanTechnica discusses the Supreme Court's role in protecting fossil fuel interests. Two polls by JC Bruce show 60% of respondents support expanding the court and 99% favor term limits. The piece argues the court's decisions impact climate policy.
The polls cited come from JC Bruce, a Florida-based Substack correspondent, with roughly 400–430 responses each. The article notes the Constitution never fixed the court's size, which has shifted historically, and points out that nine justices were once matched to nine judicial circuits while thirteen circuits exist today. Republican Representative Andy Biggs introduced a resolution in January 2025 seeking a constitutional amendment to permanently set the number at nine.
The piece frames the court's recent decisions—including striking down the Endangerment Finding—as directly affecting climate policy. It also notes several justices reportedly hold shares in fossil fuel companies, which the author argues creates conflicts of interest when energy-related cases reach the bench.
This story could influence public perception of the Supreme Court's legitimacy, particularly among climate-conscious readers who see the court as a barrier to environmental progress. If reform proposals gain traction, they may reshape how Americans view judicial independence and separation of powers. The polls, though limited in sample size, suggest potential public appetite for structural changes that could affect how climate regulations are adjudicated for decades.