Supreme Court adds DOGE records, prisoner rights, and terrorism-support cases to docket

The Supreme Court agreed to hear three new cases during its 2026-27 term. One dispute concerns discovery and FOIA requests involving the Department of Government Efficiency and whether it counts as a federal agency. Another case asks whether working as a cook at a camp operated by violent separatists amounts to providing material support for terrorism under immigration law.
The Court’s 2026-27 docket now includes a dispute over access to records concerning the Department of Government Efficiency. CREW sought DOGE communications and personnel financial disclosures through FOIA, plus expedited discovery on whether DOGE qualifies as a federal agency. A district judge largely granted those requests; the D.C. Circuit declined to pause them.
After an unsigned June 2025 order narrowed discovery and shielded internal executive communications, CREW revised its requests. DOGE returned to the justices in March, arguing lower courts had not properly applied separation-of-powers deference. The docket also includes a case asking whether cooking at a camp run by violent separatists constitutes material support for terrorism under immigration law, and a prisoner rights matter.
Count words. First para: The(1) Court’s2 2026-27? maybe one. docket3 now4 includes5 a6 dispute7 over8 access9 to10 records11 concerning12 the13 Department14 of15 Government16 Efficiency17. CREW18 sought19 DOGE20 communications21 and22 personnel23 financial24 disclosures25 through26 FOIA27, plus28 expedited29 discovery30 on31 whether32 DOGE33 qualifies34 as35 a36 federal37 agency38. A39 district40 judge41 largely42 granted43 those44 requests45; the46 D.C.47 Circuit48 declined49 to50 pause51 them52. Second: After53 an54 unsigned55 June56 2025? maybe 2025 counts? order57 narrowed58 discovery59 and60 shielded61 internal62 executive63 communications64, CREW65 revised66 its67 requests68. DOGE
[paragraph] Need maybe two short paragraphs in EXPANDED. Under 120 words total. We have 113. Good. But "The docket also includes a case asking whether cooking at a camp run by violent separatists constitutes material support for terrorism under immigration law, and a prisoner rights matter." This is drawn from summary/headline. Good. Need ensure no copying source phrasing. We used "Department of Government Efficiency", "FOIA", "DOGE", "CREW", "D.C. Circuit", "separation-of-powers deference", "material support for terrorism", "immigration law", "prisoner rights". These are terms, okay. "violent separatists" from summary. "cooking at a camp" original. "financial disclosures" maybe source phrase? It's factual term. Fine. Potential issue: "After an unsigned June 2025 order narrowed discovery and shielded internal executive communications" The material says unsigned order in early June 2025 sent dispute back, wrote portions requiring disclosure content of recommendations and whether foll